• Users Online: 1423
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
  Table of Contents  
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 296  

Reply to: Detailed limitations of study help readers to interpret results effectively


Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia

Date of Web Publication5-Jul-2017

Correspondence Address:
Feroze Kaliyadan
Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Hofuf
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_100_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Alshehri MD, Almutairi AT, Alomran AM, Alrashed BA, Kaliyadan F. Reply to: Detailed limitations of study help readers to interpret results effectively. Indian Dermatol Online J 2017;8:296

How to cite this URL:
Alshehri MD, Almutairi AT, Alomran AM, Alrashed BA, Kaliyadan F. Reply to: Detailed limitations of study help readers to interpret results effectively. Indian Dermatol Online J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 8];8:296. Available from: http://www.idoj.in/text.asp?2017/8/4/296/209601

Sir,

We would like to thank the authors for their interest and the incisive comments on our article.[1] In response, we would like to mention the following points:

  1. We did include only valid responses from respondents who had acne. We thought this would be self-evident, but we agree that we could be more clear on this
  2. “The response rate could not be ascertained exactly as the electronic survey might have reached a much larger sample of students.” What we meant was that, because the survey was also posted electronically on online portals such as student discussion forum, it could have reached a much larger sample than what was targeted based on the calculated sample size


  3. The above clarification should hopefully address the points 1 and 2 raised by the author

  4. For the Cronbach's alpha, what we indeed meant was reliability (internal consistency), it was inadvertently written as validity and we agree completely that the value of 0.405 indicates a low measure of internal consistency. This could partly be because, as mentioned, the questionnaire was addressing multiple factors, which were not necessarily homogenous. We again agree with the author that we could have mentioned the implications of a low Cronbach's alpha for the less aware reader
  5. We are entirely for explicitly mentioning limitations in scientific studies. We did mention some of the general limitations, but we admit that we did not specifically mention the limitations related to the methodology – partly because of the fact that some of these would be obvious (such as the low Cronbach's alpha), and partly, as the author mentions, because of the need for brevity, but we completely agree that other points such as the absence of pretesting could be stated explicitly.


Once again we thank the author for the valuable critique of our work.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Alshehri MD, Almutairi AT, Alomran AM, Alrashed BA, Kaliyadan F. Over-the-counter and prescription medications for acne: A cross-sectional survey in a sample of university students in Saudi Arabia. Indian Dermatol Online J 2017;8:120-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed430    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded69    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal