• Users Online: 706
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
  Table of Contents  
THROUGH THE DERMOSCOPE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 92-93  

Dermoscopy of morphea


Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College Srinagar, Karan Nagar Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Date of Web Publication14-Jan-2019

Correspondence Address:
Yasmeen Jabeen Bhat
Department of Dermatology, Government Medical College Srinagar, Karan Nagar Srinagar - 190 010, Jammu and Kashmir
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_350_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Bhat YJ, Akhtar S, Hassan I. Dermoscopy of morphea. Indian Dermatol Online J 2019;10:92-3

How to cite this URL:
Bhat YJ, Akhtar S, Hassan I. Dermoscopy of morphea. Indian Dermatol Online J [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Feb 17];10:92-3. Available from: http://www.idoj.in/text.asp?2019/10/1/92/250076



A 28-year-old female presented with an area of thickening and hypopigmentation of the skin over the left side of her neck for 2 years [Figure 1]. She gave history of reddish discoloration of the skin initially which slowly started thickening and became hypopigmented. She had applied several topical medications for the same. On examination, there was an oval hypopigmented indurated plaque over the left side of the neck with the surrounding skin showing hyperpigmentation.
Figure 1: Hypopigmented plaque on left side of neck

Click here to view


Dermoscopic examination of the lesion was done (Dermlite DL3N, California USA, 10×). In the polarized mode, there were whitish fibrotic beams with linear branching vessels crossing the beams [Figure 2]a. It is important to differentiate the pattern of vessels in morphea from cases of steroid abuse where the vessels are mostly telengiectatic compared to linear branching vessels in morphea crossing the white fibrotic beams. In addition, the area showed loss of hair compared to the surrounding skin, again supporting the diagnosis of morphea [Figure 2]b. Histopathological examination of the biopsy was done for confirmation of the diagnosis, which showed thinned epidermis with flattened rete ridges, minimal inflammation in the dermis with collagenization of dermis, and loss of adnexae [Figure 3]a. The papillary dermis showed homogenous collagen whereas reticular dermis and subcutis consisted of thickened closely packed hypocellular eosinophilic collagen bands with hyalinization arranged parallel to each other. Mild perivascular chronic inflammation and absence of adnexae was seen in the dermis [Figure 3]b. The white fibrotic bands correspond to the dermal sclerosis seen on histopathology, and loss of adnexae was seen both on dermoscopy as well as on histopathology.
Figure 2:(a) White fibrotic beams (blue star) crossed by linear branching vessels (black arrows). (b) Loss of hair in the involved area (green arrows) compared to adjacent area (blue arrow)(Polarized mode, Dermlite DL3N, California USA, ×10) with occasional pigment dots (red arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 3:(a) Histopathologicalimage of the same patient showing thinned epidermis with flattened rete ridges (blue arrow), minimal chronic perivascular inflammation (red arrow) with absence of adnexae in the sections examined (H and E ×400). (b) Thick, closely packed collagen bundles in reticular dermis and subcutis with hyalinization (red star) (H and E ×400)

Click here to view


Morphea is a disorder of unknown etiology which presents with localized area of skin sclerosis. The dermoscopic examination of morphea can be beneficial in cases where the diagnosis is not clear, especially in darker skin types where the typical lilac border surrounding the plaque of morphea is difficult to appreciate. Whitish fibrotic beams seen on dermoscopic examination are very specific for morphea, which are frequently crossed by linear branching vessels.[1] Furthermore, the loss of appendages is evident on the magnified examination of the lesions. Dermoscopy is helpful in differentiating between morphea and lichen sclerosus as comedo-like openings and white patches characteristic of lichen sclerosus are seen less commonly in morphea.[2],[3]

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Campione E, Paternò EJ, Diluvio L, Orlandi A, Bianchi L, Chimenti S. Localized morphea treated with imiquimod 5% and dermoscopic assessment of effectiveness. J Dermatol Treat 2009;20:10-3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Tiodorovic-Zivkovic D, Argenziano G, Popovic D, Zalaudek I. Clinical and dermoscopic findings of a patient with co-existing lichen planus, lichen sclerosus and morphea. Eur J Dermatol 2012;22:143-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Shim WH, Jwa SW, Song M, Kim HS, Ko HC, Kim MB,et al. Diagnostic usefulness of dermatoscopy in differentiating lichen sclerous et atrophicus from morphea. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;66:690-1.  Back to cited text no. 3
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed99    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal