• Users Online: 227
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
  Table of Contents  
CONSICE COMMUNICATION
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 250-252  

Tattoo for camouflage: A new cause of tattoo regret


Department of Dermatology and STD, Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication9-Mar-2020

Correspondence Address:
Pravesh Yadav
RZ-97, Phase-III, Prem Nagar, Najafgarh, New Delhi - 110 043
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_189_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Yadav A, Yadav P, Yadav J, Chander R. Tattoo for camouflage: A new cause of tattoo regret. Indian Dermatol Online J 2020;11:250-2

How to cite this URL:
Yadav A, Yadav P, Yadav J, Chander R. Tattoo for camouflage: A new cause of tattoo regret. Indian Dermatol Online J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 28];11:250-2. Available from: http://www.idoj.in/text.asp?2020/11/2/250/276553



Tattooing has been in practice since millenniums across the globe for various purposes like art and beautification. The tattoo regret is also on a rise with an increase in tattooing. We herein illustrate two cases of dermatological diseases, namely vitiligo and morphea, wherein patients got them tattooed hoping to camouflage them, but ended up with tattoo regret.

A 24-year-old female presented with complaint of white patches over face since the last 2 years. These white patches started over the forehead, were insidious in onset and gradually progressive in nature. They were diagnosed as vitiligo, and on treatment, the disease got stable and remained stable for almost 9 months. There was no history suggestive of autoimmunity in person and family. She then got the lesions tattooed from a local tattoo artist for camouflaging around 6 months ago, when her friends and relatives influenced her about the tattoos. But the tattooing reactivated the disease and led to an increase in size of the older lesions and eruption of new lesions. On cutaneous examination, depigmented patches of variable sizes present over glabella area extending to dorsum of nose 3 × 3 cm, above lateral aspect of eyebrows 1 × 1 cm, right cheek 6 × 5 cm extending to philtrum, left ala of nose and involving upper lip, left cheek 2 × 2 cm, with leucotrichia of eyelashes. Purple pigmented tattooing was noticed in most of the patches and depigmented patches are seen extending beyond tattooed area [Figure 1]. Rest of the cutaneous, scalp and genital examination were normal.
Figure 1: Depigmented patches of vitiligo of variable sizes present over forehead, and both cheek with leucotrichia of eyelashes. Purple pigmented tattooing is seen in most of the patches and vitiligo patches are seen extending beyond tattooed area

Click here to view


In another scenario, a 23-year-male came with complaint of hyperpigmentation over right mandibular area extending to behind the ear since 6 years. These lesions were sudden in onset, gradually progressive in nature. There was no history of prior trauma and injection at this site. The patient was clinically diagnosed as plaque morphea and treated with topical tacrolimus 0.1% ointment from a dermatologist. The lesion stopped spreading and showed some improvement after which the patient stopped treatment. The disease remained stable for almost 2 years till 8-9 months back, when the patient got the left over lesion tattooed from local tattoo artist for the purpose of camouflaging when his friends told him about the beneficial effect of tattooing on limiting the disease. Since then, the lesion progressed rather rapidly to involve the surrounding area. Cutaneous examinations revealed well defined, hyperpigmented, indurated plaque of size 7 × 5 cm with lilac borders extending from preauricular area to right mandibular till retroauricular area with central area showing green pigment tattoo [Figure 2]. Rest of the systemic examinations were normal. Skin biopsy done at our centre was suggestive of morphea.
Figure 2: Hyperpigmented, indurated plaque with lilac borders extending from preauricular area to retroauricular area with green tattoo pigment in the centre

Click here to view


Recently, tattooing has become popular particularly among the youngsters as a fashion statement, improvement of body image and as an expression of affection towards their loved ones.[1] A study done by Latreille et al.[2] found that 44% got their tattoo before 18 years, 39.1% had amateur tattoo. Moreover, the common reasons for tattooing were imitation or influence of entourage (24%), aesthetic reasons (21%) and sentimental reasons (20%). In a study from North-east India, common reason for tattooing noted were fashion, fun and peer pressure in 87.7%, 6.6% and 4.7% of the participants, respectively.[1] As tattoos become more common, so does tattoo regret. In previous studies, it has been seen that 16-44% of people with tattoos, for various reasons, later regret at least one of their tattoos.[3],[4] The most common motivation for removal of a tattoo was enhancement of self-esteem. Other reasons for removal, such as eradication of a socially discrediting lesion, domestic pressure and improvement of employment prospects.[4] Another study done in North-east India on tattoo practices revealed that the most common reason for tattoo removal was to be eligible for armed force jobs (49.5%), followed by regret (21.7%), elder or school pressure (14.2%), personal (12.7%) and unsightly appearance such as hypertrophic scarring in tattoo (1.9%).[1] Our patients saw tattoo as an attractive prospect as it would mask their cutaneous lesion, since the appearance can be quite embarrassing in a society laden with misconception. Our patients also held a false belief that tattooing would limit their disease. Unfortunately, both our patients suffered from diseases that are known to exhibit Koebner's Phenomenon. And the tattooing led to reactivation of the disease and increase in the size of their lesions rather than its limitation. We reviewed the literature for any such previous report but were unable to trace any such instance.

Micro-pigmentation/tattooing has been recommended for camouflage in recalcitrant lesions of vitiligo, especially over distal digits, lips, hands, wrists, axillae, elbows, perianal areas, lower legs, mucosae and mucocutaneous junctions.[5] However, it can be performed only in resistant, stable and localized vitiligo.[6] Tattoos are not without risk after all. Patients are at risk for developing infections, allergic contact dermatitis, pseudolymphoma, and inflammatory reactions.[7] Therapeutic tattooing may also end up in tattoo regret due to difficulty in getting an exact color match or gradual colour fading.

Decision for micropigmentation/tattooing for therapeutic purpose should therefore be based upon proper selection of patient, stability of disease, the site of lesion, and must be performed by a dermatologist. Moreover, an exposed site of involvement like face in our patients should further stimulate us to either assess the psychiatric impact in detail or seek expert psychiatrist opinion. Such patients need proper counselling to relieve their stress to the extent that they stay away from such harmful procedures. Counselling remains an important part of the disease management, however common or trivial it might seem to a dermatologist.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Thakur BK, Verma S. Tattoo practices in North-East India: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2016;9:172-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Latreille J, Levy JL, Guinot C. Decorative tattoos and reasons for their removal: A prospective study in 151 adults living in South of France. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011;25:181-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lande RG, Bahroo BA, Soumoff A. United States military service members and their tattoos: A descriptive study. Mil Med 2013;178:921-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Varma S, Lanigan SW. Reasons for requesting laser removal of unwanted tattoos. Br J Dermatol 1999;140:483-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Halder RM, Pham HN, Breadon JY, Johnson BA. Micropigmentation for treatment of vitiligo. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989;15:1092-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kaliyadan F, Kumar A. Camouflage for patients with vitiligo. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2012;78:8-15.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
7.
Juhas E, English JC. Tattoo-associated complications. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013;26:125-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed102    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded13    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal